KEEP UP TO DATE

CONNECT  facebook youtube instagram twitter soundcloud
search advanced search

AUTHOR(S)

Sudhanshu Handa, Silvio Daidone, Amber Peterman, Benjamin Davis, Audrey Pereira, Tia Palermo, Jennifer Yablonski

DETAIL(S)

World Bank Research Observer , October 2018, vol. 33 (2), pp. 259-298.

ABSTRACT

This paper summarizes evidence on six perceptions associated with cash transfer programming, using eight rigorous evaluations conducted on large-scale government unconditional cash transfers in sub-Saharan Africa under the Transfer Project. Specifically, it investigates if transfers: 1) induce higher spending on alcohol or tobacco; 2) are fully consumed (rather than invested); 3) create dependency (reduce participation in productive activities); 4) increase fertility; 5) lead to negative community-level economic impacts (including price distortion and inflation); and 6) are fiscally unsustainable. The paper presents evidence refuting each claim, leading to the conclusion that these perceptions—insofar as they are utilized in policy debates—undercut potential improvements in well-being and livelihood strengthening among the poor, which these programs can bring about in sub-Saharan Africa, and globally. It concludes by underscoring outstanding research gaps and policy implications for the continued expansion of unconditional cash transfers in the region and beyond.
LANGUAGE:
English
SOURCE: VIEW ARTICLE

LIBRARY RECORD

JOURNAL TITLEWorld Bank Research Observer
YEAR2018
VOLUME33
No. 2
PAGE(S)259-298
SOURCEVIEW ARTICLE
DESCRIPTORSCash transfers
Sub-saharan africa
GEO DESCRIPTORSSub-saharan africa
RESEARCH PROJECT(S) Social Protection & Cash Transfers
PEER REVIEWEDYES