Reset filters
AUTHOR(S) Karen Devries, Katherine G. Merrill, Louise Knight, Sarah Bott, Alessandra Guedes, Betzabe Butron-Riveros
AUTHOR(S) Amber Peterman, Tia Palermo, Giulia Ferrari
We call for further investments in evidence generation around economic strengthening before scaling-up potentially ineffective interventions
AUTHOR(S) Fidelia Dake, Luisa Natali, Gustavo Angeles, Jacobus de Hoop, Sudhanshu Handa
AUTHOR(S) G. Seymour, Amber Peterman
AUTHOR(S) Fidelia Dake, Luisa Natali, G. Angeles, Jacobus de Hoop, Sudhanshu Handa, Amber Peterman
AUTHOR(S) Ana C. Dammert, Jacobus de Hoop, Eric Mvukiyehe, Furio Camillo Rosati
AUTHOR(S) Sudhanshu Handa, Silvio Daidone, Amber Peterman, Benjamin Davis, Audrey Pereira, Tia Palermo, Jennifer Yablonski
AUTHOR(S) A.M. Buller, Amber Peterman, M. Raganathan, A. Bleile, M. Hidrobo, L. Heise
AUTHOR(S) Jose Cuesta, L. Maratou-Kolias
This paper develops a simple econometric strategy to operationalise the United Nations Children’s Fund’s (UNICEF’s) conceptual framework for nutrition. It estimates the extent to which child stunting correlates with investments in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) across population groups (poor and nonpoor) and residence (urban and rural). Moving away from estimating single intervention marginal returns, the empirical framework of intervention packages is tested in Tunisia, a country with notable but uneven progress in reducing stunting. A successful nutritional strategy will thereby require mapping the distinctive intervention packages by residence and socio-economic status, away from universal policies, that more strongly correlate with reduction in stunting.
AUTHOR(S) Sudhanshu Handa, Luisa Natali, David Seidenfeld, Gelson Tembo, Benjamin Davis